Vermoegensschutz: The 7 Biggest Risks for Familienvermoegen

Why Vermoegensschutz comes before Nachfolgeplanung

Most families begin their wealth planning with the wrong question. They ask: who inherits what? They should first ask: what is even left when the succession event occurs?

Vermoegensschutz means safeguarding the substance of Familienvermoegen against all conceivable claims — tax, Pflichtteil, care, insolvency, dispute, wrong partner — through structural precautions, before those claims become acute. The biggest risk for Familienvermoegen is not the tax office. It is the things you are not thinking about: a guarantee from an old business life. The new partner of your daughter. A sudden need for care. Siblings who would rather break up the family business than continue it.

Vermoegensschutz is the phase before Nachfolgeplanung. If the foundation does not stand, the most elegant handover strategy is worthless. Below we show the seven risks that families with substance most often fall victim to — and which structures in 2026 practice really protect.

Risk 1: Liability from profession or business

A loss in business life can destroy private assets. Anyone who as a self-employed person, entrepreneur or freelancer fails to make a clean separation between private and business assets is, in case of doubt, liable with the entire Familienvermoegen. Even ten-year-old guarantees, forgotten personal debt assumptions or managing-director liability under § 43 GmbHG often only hit at retirement age — exactly when the assets were supposed to be secured for the next generation.

What protects: the GmbH and the GmbH & Co. KG are the classic vehicles for liability shielding. A Holding structure with its tax advantages and liability shield bundles multiple shareholdings above it and creates an additional layer of protection. The separation of operating business and asset-managing Holding is the standard architecture for entrepreneurs with substance. Decisive is strict observance of the separation principles — anyone who places private assets uncontrollably into the GmbH and takes them out again, or neglects formal resolutions, risks the liability piercing under settled Bundesgerichtshof case law and thus the loss of all protection.

Risk 2: Pflichtteil claims at the succession event

Pflichtteilsberechtigte (persons entitled to the compulsory share under § 2303 BGB) children can demand money even where they have been disinherited. The claim amounts to half of the value of the statutory share (§ 2303 BGB) and is payable immediately in cash. Where the Familienvermoegen is tied up in a business or in real estate, an emergency sale at a knockdown price is on the cards.

Sample calculation: an entrepreneur leaves his wife and only son assets of four million euros, mostly tied up in a GmbH. The son has been disinherited. His statutory share would have been 50 percent, i.e. two million euros. His Pflichtteil is half of that — one million euros. The widow has to raise this amount within months. Without precautions this means the sale of company shares, mostly considerably below value.

What protects: a notarial Pflichtteilsverzicht (waiver of the compulsory share) against appropriate compensation creates planning certainty. Lifetime Schenkungen take effect through the abatement rule of § 2325 BGB: the value to be considered for the Pflichtteil supplement falls by ten percent for every completed year after the Schenkung, so that after ten years there is no further consideration. A Familienpool with restriction clauses substantially lowers the market value of shares for Pflichtteil purposes, because non-freely transferable shares are assigned valuation discounts.

Risk 3: Your own child and the wrong partner

Once assets have been transferred, they belong entirely to the new owner. Parents no longer have access — even where the new partner of the child puts the assets to dubious use, or where the child later divorces and the equalisation of accrued gains applies. A life's work can be squandered within a few years.

Particularly delicate is the divorce situation: if the child inherits during a marriage without a marriage contract, the inheritance does belong to the initial assets (§ 1374 BGB) and is therefore in principle protected from the equalisation of accrued gains — but the increase in value of this inheritance during the marriage falls into the accrued gain. With a long marriage and well-rising values, this can lead to a silent halving of the substance gain.

What protects during lifetime: a Schenkung with reservation of Niessbrauch (lifetime usufruct, gives donor right to use/enjoy a transferred asset; matters for § 2325 BGB Pflichtteilsergänzung and § 14 ErbStG 10-year-clock) transfers ownership but leaves economic control with the parents. A Familienpool with restriction clauses prevents unilateral sales by the child. A Familienstiftung with all conditions and costs in detail takes over the assets entirely — the child is only a beneficiary, never an owner.

What protects after death: a long-term testamentary execution administers the inheritance for up to 30 years and pays out monthly amounts instead of releasing the entire estate at once. A prior heir / subsequent heir arrangement secures the substance for the next generation. A testamentary Familienstiftung takes over long-term provision. A useful supplement is suggesting a marriage contract before any marriage of the child — the only measure that truly reliably operates against the divorce case.

Risk 4: Care costs and social-welfare recourse

If a family member becomes in need of care and their own means do not suffice, the social welfare office steps in — and can claim back Schenkungen of the last ten years through the reclaim rule of § 528 BGB (by assignment of claim under § 93 SGB XII). Anyone planning too late pays in the care case with the Familienvermoegen. Monthly nursing-home costs regularly reach EUR 4,500 to EUR 6,500 per person in Germany in 2026; with two years of nursing care in an upmarket home, six-figure amounts are quickly consumed.

What protects: early Schenkungen with Niessbrauch reservation use the ten-year deadline. Important trap: with a comprehensive Niessbrauch covering all economic advantages, the deadline does not start to run under settled Bundesfinanzhof case law, because the donor economically retains the asset. Preferred is therefore a moderate Niessbrauch — for example limited to income, with clear surrender of the possibility of use, or a partial Niessbrauch. The disabled-person Testament is the special solution for disabled family members. Conditional Schenkungen with a reclaim clause offer additional flexibility in the case of looming risks.

Risk 5: Insolvency or attachment with the heir

If an heir is in debt, in insolvency or threatened with attachment, the inherited assets flow directly to creditors. The planned succession ends in the heir's debt spiral. Substance built up over generations is gone in weeks. Particularly critical: even future inheritance claims can be captured during the good-behaviour phase of consumer insolvency — a deliberate disclaimer regularly leads to denial of residual debt discharge.

What protects: a prior heir / subsequent heir arrangement makes the heir a prior heir — they may use, but not sell or give away. After their death the substance passes to the subsequent heirs. A testamentary execution separates the assets from free access by creditors and secures them for the next generation. The combination of non-discharged prior heirship and testamentary execution is the most robust construction against insolvency access and is regularly used in advisory practice for vulnerable heirs.

Risk 6: Disputes between siblings

Co-heir communities are the nightmare of any family business. Three siblings, three opinions, three lawyers — and the business blocks itself. The co-heir community can under § 2042 BGB be pushed by any member to a division at any time, which in dispute forces a sale. The average duration of contested co-heir community proceedings, according to experience from advisory practice, is three to seven years — a period in which every entrepreneurial development freezes.

What protects: a Familienpool bundles the shareholdings in a company (typically GbR or GmbH & Co. KG) and bindingly regulates voting, disposal and division rights. A Familienstiftung takes the assets out of the co-heir community entirely — siblings become beneficiaries but are no longer owners and cannot force a sale. A pool agreement secures at least common market presence. Anyone wanting to keep a family business long-term in the family practically never gets around one of these structures.

Risk 7: Tax access on handover or sale

Anyone who sells a business directly out of private assets quickly pays more than 40 percent in income tax plus solidarity surcharge. With inheritances the Erbschaftsteuer (German inheritance tax) hits with tax rates up to 50 percent in tax class III (§ 19 ErbStG). Structured families regularly remain significantly below this — the concrete rates and allowances by degree of kinship can be found in our Erbschaftsteuer table 2026 with allowances and tax classes.

Sample calculation Holding effect: if a natural person sells business shares with a gain of two million euros, income tax under the Teileinkuenfteverfahren applies to 60 percent of this gain — at the top tax rate around EUR 570,000 tax burden. If instead a interposed Holding GmbH sells the same shares, 95 percent of the gain is tax-free under § 8b para. 2 KStG. The effective tax burden in the Holding is around EUR 30,000 — a difference of over half a million euros that is available for reinvestment.

What protects: the Holding structure via the Schachtelprivileg makes capital gains from shareholdings 95 percent tax-free. The exemption rules for business assets under §§ 13a, 13b ErbStG (statutory text at gesetze-im-internet.de) can, on fulfilment of the wage sum and retention periods, lead to an 85 percent or, in the case of the Optionsverschonung, 100 percent tax exemption. A Familienstiftung shifts the tax burden into a 30-year period with the Erbersatzsteuer (§ 1 para. 1 no. 4 ErbStG) and enables long-term planning without generational-change leaps.

How it all fits together

The following overview shows which vehicle primarily acts against which risk and from what scale the effort pays off:

Vermoegensschutz is never a single vehicle. It is a coordinated system of multiple building blocks that interlock. Most families need two to four structures combined — a Holding, a Familienpool, often a Familienstiftung, regularly a testamentary execution. The right sequence of build-up is decisive because later repairs become painful.

A typical build-up phase runs as follows: in the first step the operating assets are bundled in a GmbH and a Holding placed above it. In the second step lifetime Schenkungen under Niessbrauch reservation are prepared to start the ten-year deadlines. In the third step — usually after three to seven years of further planning — depending on the risk position a Familienstiftung or a Familienpool is set up. Only at the end, often years later, do Testament and testamentary execution come along.

A similar risk analysis — tailored to professional athletes with a short earnings curve — can be found in our article Wealth planning for professional athletes and the 7 biggest traps. The most important insight from advisory practice nevertheless remains the same: families that plan early gain time, room for manoeuvre and clarity. Families that wait pay more in the end — more tax, more dispute, more substance loss.

Step by step: building up Vermoegensschutz in 6 stages

In my advisory practice this sequence has proven itself — repair in the wrong order always costs more than build-up in the right order.

Step 1: inventory + risk mapping

Full list of all assets (private assets, shareholdings, real estate, foreign assets), all liabilities (including old guarantees), all liability and Pflichtteil situations. From my practice: guarantees from the 90s are more often a problem than younger risks.

Step 2: liability shielding — operating assets into a GmbH

Transfer operating activity out of the natural person into a GmbH. Strictly observe the separation principles (§ 13 GmbHG). Check existing personal liability traps (guarantees, managing-director liability under § 43 GmbHG) and dissolve them where possible.

Step 3: Holding above the operating GmbH

Set up an asset-managing Holding, contribute the shares in the operating GmbH. The Schachtelprivileg under § 8b KStG (95 percent tax-free) makes sales + dividends tax-efficient.

Step 4: start lifetime Schenkungen (10-year deadline clock)

Gift with moderate Niessbrauch reservation — NO comprehensive Niessbrauch, otherwise the § 14 ErbStG and § 2325 BGB deadline does not start to run at all. The BFH has clarified this several times — anyone who overlooks it loses the entire Schenkung strategy.

Step 5: pool or foundation depending on risk situation

Familienpool (GbR or GmbH & Co. KG) where continued family ownership and voting-rights control are wanted. Familienstiftung where assets are to leave the family ownership sphere (insolvency protection, Pflichtteil security after 10 years). From around EUR 2 to 5 million in substance economically sensible.

Step 6: Testament + testamentary execution

Only at the end — once the structures stand, Testament and execution are fine-tuning rather than an emergency solution. Long-term execution up to 30 years is possible (§ 2210 BGB). With vulnerable heirs: combination of prior heir / subsequent heir + testamentary execution.

Frequently asked questions

From what assets does structured Vermoegensschutz pay off?

A rough threshold in practice lies at around EUR 800,000 Familienvermoegen or with active entrepreneurial activity carrying significant liability risk. Below this, marriage contract, Testament and a sensible insurance constellation usually suffice. Above, structures such as Holding or Familienpool almost always pay off — both for tax reasons and with a view to dispute and liability protection.

What does a Familienstiftung cost in set-up and on an ongoing basis?

The one-off founding costs lie between around EUR 10,000 and EUR 30,000 depending on complexity (Notar, lawyer, Steuerberater, recognition by the foundation supervisory authority). On an ongoing basis, around EUR 3,000 to EUR 8,000 per year for accounting, annual financial statements and foundation administration add up. In addition, the Erbersatzsteuer every 30 years under § 1 para. 1 no. 4 ErbStG, which depending on foundation assets can become six-figure.

How do Familienpool and Familienstiftung differ?

The Familienpool is a company in which the family remains the owner — usually as a GbR or GmbH & Co. KG. The Familienstiftung, by contrast, has no owner; the assets belong to it. The pool is more flexible and easier to build up; the foundation protects more strongly against insolvency, Pflichtteil and dispute, but is final.

Does a Holding really protect against private liability?

Yes — provided the separation principles are strictly observed. Anyone who deposits and withdraws private assets into the GmbH uncontrollably, neglects formal resolutions or uses the company as a hidden private till risks the liability piercing. The shareholder then liable under settled BGH case law (such as BGH II ZR 300/00 on commingling of assets) effectively as if there were no GmbH.

When does the ten-year deadline for Schenkungen start?

This depends on which of the three ten-year periods is meant. For the Pflichtteilsergaenzung under § 2325 (3) BGB, the comprehensive reserved Niessbrauch suspends the start of the period — under settled BGH case law (IV ZR 30/76 and follow-up case law), only the economic loss of the asset counts. For the welfare-office clawback under § 528, § 529 (1) BGB the position is different: the period runs from the dispositive performance despite the Niessbrauch reservation, under BGH X ZR 140/10 of 19 July 2011. The Schenkungsteuer aggregation under § 14 ErbStG likewise runs from performance; the Niessbrauch there only operates as a valuation discount (§ 25 ErbStG, BFH II R 8/16). The key advisory lesson: a Niessbrauch reservation protects against the Pflichtteilsergaenzung claim but NOT against the social welfare office.

Can I reclaim a Schenkung in the care case?

A reclaim of one's own due to impoverishment of the donor is possible under § 528 BGB where the donor can no longer provide for their own maintenance. The reverse case is significantly more frequent: the social welfare office pays first and then assigns the claim to itself (§ 93 SGB XII). Early Schenkungen with observed ten-year deadlines are the only reliable protection.

Does a Pflichtteilsverzicht prevent every claim?

A Pflichtteilsverzicht through a notarised Erbvertrag (inheritance contract under § 1941 BGB) (§§ 2346, 2348 BGB) covers the classic Pflichtteil claim and also the Pflichtteilsergänzungsanspruch, provided the waiver is formulated accordingly. Caution: a waiver without appropriate compensation can be immoral under § 138 BGB and therefore invalid. The amount of the compensation must, at the time of notarisation, stand in a defensible relation to the expected Pflichtteil value.

How many Schenkung rounds per generation are realistic?

In my practice: with spouses 1x per 10 years the full allowance (EUR 500,000), with children 1x per 10 years EUR 400,000. Anyone starting 30 years before the succession event can transfer three tranches of EUR 400k = EUR 1.2 million per child Pflichtteil-securely — provided the Niessbrauch is moderate and the deadline is running.

If you want to go deeper

This article summarises the seven risks at an overview level. We have prepared a detailed guide that contains anonymised practice examples, concrete sample calculations, detailed vehicle descriptions and step-by-step recommendations for each risk.

If you recognise yourself in one or more of the seven risks and want to talk about your situation — get in touch. I take 30 minutes for you, free of charge and confidentially. We go through your situation, I tell you openly where I see a need for action, and you decide whether and how you want to continue.

Book an appointment online or leave a message via the contact form — with the keyword "7 Risiken" I will then send you the full guide.

No sales call. No commission. Just an honest look at what you have built — and a concrete proposal for how we protect it together.

---

Legal note

This article serves general information and does not constitute individual tax or legal advice. Despite careful research no guarantee can be given for correctness, completeness and currency. Tax and legal matters require individual assessment. An advisory service within the meaning of the German Tax Consulting Act (§ 2 StBerG) only arises through an express mandate agreement. Legal position: May 2026. Full legal notes at florian-enders.de/disclaimer.